Arc of Ambedkar's Fraternity

Law, Secularism, Religion

Price: 995.00 INR

We sell our titles through other companies
Disclaimer :You will be redirected to a third party website.The sole responsibility of supplies, condition of the product, availability of stock, date of delivery, mode of payment will be as promised by the said third party only. Prices and specifications may vary from the OUP India site.

ISBN:

9780197908167

Publication date:

19/11/2026

Hardback

280 pages

216x140mm

Price: 995.00 INR

We sell our titles through other companies
Disclaimer :You will be redirected to a third party website.The sole responsibility of supplies, condition of the product, availability of stock, date of delivery, mode of payment will be as promised by the said third party only. Prices and specifications may vary from the OUP India site.

ISBN:

9780197908167

Publication date:

19/11/2026

Hardback

280 pages

Rowena Robinson

  • Contextualizes Ambedkar's concept of fraternity within global scholarly frameworks through his writings and speeches and Constituent Assembly debates
  • Analyses Supreme Court judgements on fraternity, comparing legal studies and social sciences-based research perspectives
  • Explores two strands of Ambedkar's fraternity—based in constitutionalism and religion, respectively—offering a new understanding via Derrida

Rowena Robinson

Description

  • Arc of Ambedkar's Fraternity focuses on B. R. Ambedkar in the light of recent global interest in constitutional fraternity. The book locates his work in the context of contemporary scholarship and examines deliberations on fraternity in the Constituent Assembly in relation to democracy and the divisions of caste, class, and religion. It looks at Supreme Court judgements and legal discussions that gradually interpreted Ambedkar's fraternity to frame state obligations and the socioeconomic rights of individuals and groups in relation to each other.

    Robinson reflects on the disappearance of fraternity and emergence of secularism as the focus of Indian social science debates, and the book highlights the need to bridge this gap by considering how the two are interconnected. Finally, the discussion turns to another strand in Ambedkar's thought, which located fraternity in religion, specifically, Navayana Buddhism, and questioned the limitations of democratic constitutionalism and secular law in creating fraternity. This perspective is read in the light of Derrida, who similarly indicated the paradox of fraternity in modern democracy. Ambedkar's Buddhism is thus interpreted not as an abandonment of politics or its practical resolution, but as an acknowledgement of the indeterminacy involved in keeping fraternity and democracy open to what is to come.

  •  

Rowena Robinson

Rowena Robinson

Rowena Robinson

Rowena Robinson

Description

  • Arc of Ambedkar's Fraternity focuses on B. R. Ambedkar in the light of recent global interest in constitutional fraternity. The book locates his work in the context of contemporary scholarship and examines deliberations on fraternity in the Constituent Assembly in relation to democracy and the divisions of caste, class, and religion. It looks at Supreme Court judgements and legal discussions that gradually interpreted Ambedkar's fraternity to frame state obligations and the socioeconomic rights of individuals and groups in relation to each other.

    Robinson reflects on the disappearance of fraternity and emergence of secularism as the focus of Indian social science debates, and the book highlights the need to bridge this gap by considering how the two are interconnected. Finally, the discussion turns to another strand in Ambedkar's thought, which located fraternity in religion, specifically, Navayana Buddhism, and questioned the limitations of democratic constitutionalism and secular law in creating fraternity. This perspective is read in the light of Derrida, who similarly indicated the paradox of fraternity in modern democracy. Ambedkar's Buddhism is thus interpreted not as an abandonment of politics or its practical resolution, but as an acknowledgement of the indeterminacy involved in keeping fraternity and democracy open to what is to come.

  •